The differences between a Coat of Arms & Family Crest
Misconceptions and Modern Use
In modern times, the terms “coat of arms” and “family crest” are often confused:
• Many people mistakenly believe that the crest alone represents the entirety of the coat of arms.
• Others assume that every family has a coat of arms or crest, but in reality, coats of arms were historically limited to nobility, military leaders, and some prominent families.
Today, coats of arms and crests are still used in a variety of ways:
• Royal and Noble Houses – European royal families continue to use coats of arms in official capacities.
• Municipal and Civic Heraldry – Cities, universities, and institutions often have official coats of arms.
• Personal Use – Some families continue to display coats of arms or crests in home decor, seals, and even tattoos.
• Corporate Logos – Many companies draw inspiration from heraldry to create distinctive logos (e.g., Lamborghini’s bull crest).
Conclusion
While a coat of arms and a family crest are closely related, they are not the same. A coat of arms is a complete heraldic representation consisting of various components, including a shield, helm, and crest. A family crest, on the other hand, is a specific part of the coat of arms—the figure or symbol above the helmet. The confusion between the two terms stems from their historical usage and the modern tendency to simplify heraldic traditions. Understanding these differences provides deeper insight into the art and history of heraldry, highlighting the significance of these symbols in defining personal, familial, and institutional identity.